Skip to content

McGowan, 2007

The purpose of this study was to explore the possible relationship between school facility conditions and school outcomes such as student academic achievement, attendance, discipline, completion rate and teacher turnover rate.

School facility condition for the participating schools was determined by the Total Learning Environment Assessment (TLEA) as completed by the principal or principal’s designee on high school campuses in Texas with enrollments between 1,000 and 2000 and economically disadvantaged enrollments less than 40%. Each school in the study population was organized by grades nine through twelve. Data for achievement, attendance, discipline, completion rate and teacher turnover rate were collected through the Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS) managed by the Texas Education Agency.

View Dissertation

By Angel Ford

She’s been teaching elementary grades for over 30 years.  At times she’s been in clean, well maintained classrooms with plenty of functional desks.  At times she’s been in classrooms with broken fixtures and a shortage of desks.

This year the poor conditions are just too much.  She has a student that can’t fit into any of the desks and has to sacrifice her own workspace just so he has a place to sit.  It’s December and she’s going on her second month without heat.  She encourages her students to wear gloves in the classroom. 

The lighting is out in one corner of her room so that students struggle to see their books and assignments.  One of her students recently broke a leg and is in a wheelchair.  The classroom is so small that he has to sit in the doorway—creating a safety hazard, while at the same time bringing in the added distraction of hallway noise.

In addition to these struggles, the custodial staff has been reduced and classrooms are only cleaned once a week.  Teachers are expected to take out their classroom trash daily.

The problems reach beyond individual classrooms.  Right now a couple of the stalls in the girls’ bathroom are not working, so bathroom breaks take longer than usual, taking time away from instruction.   The playground has equipment that is cordoned off because of safety concerns, so the children have less encouragement for physical activity while outside for recess.

Sure, there had been other trials increasing over the past few years too, such as administrative turnover and increases in high stakes testing.  Yet it is simply too much to ask of an educator trying to teach children to read and perform mathematic computations, to be in a classroom without appropriate climate control, and to have to keep it clean throughout the week, and then to sacrifice safety, to accommodate an injured child.

She knew a couple of the newer teachers who were looking for positions in other local schools that were in better physical condition, but she was just too tired.  She would retire early.  Her plan had been to work a couple more years, but now she just didn’t feel she would have the energy.  She walked down the hall—picking up wadded papers along the way—and slipped her letter of resignation into her principal’s mailbox.  She would do her best to make it through the next two months.  She loved her second graders and she would miss them, but her bones ached from the cold and she didn’t have the energy to explain to parents why their students had to bundle up to sit in her classroom. 

There were many factors leading to her decision, but the one in the front of her mind was the physical condition of her classroom and the rest of the school. 

The story above is a fictional portrayal of actual situations I have personally witnessed or heard about from educators.  This scene, or ones close it, plays out all too often in school buildings around our nation.  We have a growing problem of teachers leaving the profession, and I propose that one factor is the increasing deterioration of the physical conditions in which they must work and teach.

Evidence shows that teachers in facilities that are in poor physical condition have more negative attitudes about their classrooms than teachers in good facilities (Earthman & Lemasters, 2009).  With over half of the schools in America in need of repairs to be in ‘good’ condition (NCES, 2014), a great number of teachers are working in suboptimal conditions.  Add to this the fact that if the school buildings are in poor shape there is often the companion problem of not having enough resources available, and frustration increases (Uline & Tschannen-Moran, 2008).

Emphasis must be placed on maintaining learning spaces that are in acceptable condition and improving those that are not.  Investing in school buildings is one way to invest in the teachers that use the spaces (Buckley, Schneider, & Shang, 2005).  Providing safe and healthy school environments may encourage educators to stay in their field.

References

Buckley, J., Schneider, M., & Shang, Y. (2005). Fix it and they might stay: School facility quality and teacher retention in Washington, DC. The Teachers College Record107(5), 1107-1123.

Earthman, G. I., & Lemasters, L. K. (2009). Teacher attitudes about classroom conditions. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(3), 323-335.

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2014). Condition of America’s public schools facilities. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014022.pdf

Uline, C., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2008). The walls speak: The interplay of quality facilities, school climate, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(1), 55-73.

Angel Ford is a research associate with Education Facilities Clearinghouse, where she is actively involved in research and content management of the EFC Website.  She is also currently pursuing her Doctorate in Education with her dissertation topic  in the area of educational facilities.

By Lauren Jesmer, Healthy Schools Network, Inc.

School buildings are not usually the first place people think about when discussing concern for the environment, but perhaps they should. Why? Over 55 million children and seven million adults—20% of the U.S. population—are in schools every day.[1] Children and women of childbearing age are more vulnerable to the harmful effects of environmental contaminants. Nine of ten school occupants nationwide are women and children. Therefore, healthy indoor school environments are of particular importance.

Children need clean air outdoors, and they also need clean air indoors. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has estimated that half of all schools have indoor pollution problems that are largely avoidable. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) reported that polluted indoor environments are already damaging the nation’s health and learning, and it has recommended taking action to prevent exposures to indoor contaminants.[2]

Schools simply have not been designed, built and operated to be environmentally responsible for those occupants most vulnerable to toxic hazards. Even new ‘green’ building standards too often miss the mark when it comes to indoor environmental health. But, fortunately, times are changing. For good reasons, both the EPA and the U.S. Department of Education are encouraging state agencies and local schools to take action to improve indoor air quality. It just makes sense: our children need healthy environments, it saves money to prevent pollution instead of remediating the consequences later at enormous costs, and improved indoor air quality is good for education. Healthy indoor environments have been shown to boost attendance and achievement and help with teacher recruitment, retention and productivity.[3]

Some schools have taken steps to improve the quality of their indoor environment by seeking out and buying less-hazardous products to use indoors; removing water-damaged carpets; installing hard surface flooring that is easier to clean; phasing in third-party certified green cleaning products to reduce or eliminate toxic chemicals; eliminating air fresheners and room deodorizers; disposing of old, outdated and hazardous chemicals to reduce the risks of spills and injuries; keeping food and pets out of classrooms to reduce pest infestations; and decluttering classrooms to make them easier to clean at the end of the day. Energy efficient lighting and ventilation systems are additional cost-effective strategies to improve indoor school environments.

On the thirteenth anniversary of National Healthy Schools Day, take the opportunity to think about your school. What steps are being taken to protect the health and wellbeing of the individuals and children who, during the school year, may spend eight or more hours there every day? What steps can you take to help? For more help, visit http://www.epa.gov/iaq/schools/index.html or www.healthyschools.org.

Printable Blog

Lauren Jesmer is the Program Manager at the Healthy Schools Network where she coordinates and manages National Healthy Schools Day and other programs for the organization. Healthy Schools Network advocates for environmental health in schools across the country, with focuses on green cleaning, healthy products, indoor air quality, and more. HealthySchools.org, NationalHealthySchoolsDay.org, CleaningforHealthySchools.org.

 

[1] Healthy Schools Network, Inc. (2013). Towards Healthy Schools 2015. Albany, NY.

[2] IOM (Institute of Medicine). (2011). Climate Change, the Indoor Environment, and Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

[3] "About the Guidelines." EPA. http://www.epa.gov/schools/guidelinestools/ehguide/read/about.html#importance.

21st Century Schools, 2010. There has been a slow but steady increase of research on the impact of public school facilities on educational achievement and community outcomes and of the rigor of the research. This summary of studies is part of a larger literature review conducted by the 21st Century School Fund with funding from the Charitable Trust of the Council on Educational Facility Planners International.

The review is designed as an update to the 2002 review “Do School Facilities Affect Academic Outcomes?” by Mark Schneider, originally commissioned by the 21st Century School Fund’s Building Educational Success Together collaborative and then expanded by Dr. Schneider and published by the National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.

Recent research continues to point to a small but steadily positive relationship between the quality of a public school facility and a range of academic and community outcomes.

This study reviews the literature on:

 Facilities & academic outcomes
 School building systems

View link

Earthman & Lemasters, 2009. This research was designed to investigate the possible relationship between the attitudes,teachers have about the condition of their classrooms when the classrooms were independently assessed. Previous research reported teachers in unsatisfactory classrooms felt frustrated and neglected to such an extent that they sometimes reported they were willing to leave the teaching profession. This paper aims to address these issues.

View Article

Dissertation by Leigh (2012). This study was designed to address questions related to (a) school facility conditions in two elementary schools in the Commonwealth of Virginia and (b) the relationship of school facility conditions to teacher attitudes. The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a significant relationship between school facility conditions and teacher attitudes. Two instruments were utilized to answer the proposed research questions, the Commonwealth Assessment of Physical Environment (CAPE), and the My Classroom Assessment Protocol (MCAP) instrument. The schools used in this study were selected to provide a contrast between an older and a newer building.

View Dissertation

Earthman, G., & Lemasters, L. K. (2011). 1 (1)

The theory-based program presented in this paper can be considered a paradigm, a model to investigate how school buildings influence their users. The paradigm consists of a series of relationships that explain how school authorities are responsible for the condition of the school building and how the condition of the school building influences faculty, administrators, parents, and students. Further, it explains how the condition of the building influences the attitudes and achievement of the students who attend school in the building. Theory in the field of educational administration is used to try to explain, in the absence of empirical evidence, how humans and organizations behave. The theoretical model used in this paradigm tries to explain human phenomena related to how the physical environment influences humans. The model explains how school buildings come to be in their current conditions and how the conditions then influence school staff, parents, and students.

View Article

21st Century School Fund (2009).

This review is designed as an updated to the 2002 review "Do School Facilities Affect Academic Outcomes?" by Mark Schneider, originally commissioned by the 21st Century School Fund's Building Educational Success Together collaborative then expanded by Dr. Schneider and published by a project funded by the United States Department of Education.

http://www.21csf.org/csf-home/Documents/ResearchImpactSchoolFacilitiesFeb2010.pdf

Horng, E.L. (2009). 46 (3)

One of the greatest differences in resources across schools in California comes from an inequitable distribution of teachers. This study identifies reasons for this sorting of teacher by surveying 531 teachers in a California Elementary school district. The survey ask the teachers to make choices between various workplace characteristics. With this information, the study disentangles student demographics from other characteristics of teaching jobs that are amenable to policy influences. It finds the teachers identify working conditions-particularly, school facilities, administrative support, adn class sizes-and salaries as significantly more important that student characteristics when selecting a school in which to work.

http://aer.sagepub.com/content/46/3/690.abstract