Skip to content

By Dr. Linda Lemasters

August 22, 2014. 

Scholars have researched the question for nearly a century:  Do facilities affect student outcomes and teacher instruction?  To respond to that question, the next three Bricks and Mortar BLOGS will address (a) the importance of school facilities for our nation, (b) best practices in school facilities, and (c) the impact of school facilities on the learner.  Knowledge of the three is intricately related.

We all know where the schools in our community are; most of us give little thought as we drive by them every day as to the size of their acreage, the amount of square feet under roof, the incredible amount of money to make the fields and buildings available to students, as well as community activities.  Are there any other governmental functions, other than schools, that require such a huge expanse of real estate?

A few years ago the 21st Century School Fund shared a fact sheet with general composite information about school facility infrastructure (2011).  Although I have worked with school facilities for over two decades, I had no idea of the magnitude of our national school resources.  The facts are:  there are nearly 100,000 preK-12 public schools, which over 55 million school-age children attend, and over 6.6 billion gross square footage of building space and 1 million acres of site area.  The public investment is well worth discussion by educators.  If we add this information to a more recent survey from the United States Department of Education via the National Center for Education Statistics (2014) on facilities, the facts are more startling.  Of the 1800 schools surveyed, billions of dollars are needed for renovations and repairs, averaging $4.5 million per school.  Even with only a small portion of our total 100,000 public schools having the same needs, there is a crisis in the public schools our children attend.

Another area we often overlook is the funding needed for operating our school buildings.  Utilities alone cost localities nearly $9.5 billion dollars a year—fluctuating with the weather.  Knowing that these costs fall totally to the localities, along with the majority of other upkeep expenses in most states, should make us attentive to the scope of the influence of facilities on our localities and states.  In addition, personnel for schools take 60-80% of local budgets.

What are the implications for our students and teachers—and for communities?   Most frequently, the needed maintenance, retrofits and renovations entail HVAC, replacing ineffective windows and doors, upgrading classroom lighting, and replacing leaking roofs.  We all need fresh air, especially children, yet many of the old HVAC systems do not provide the proper ventilation; some do not maintain a thermal environment to enable students to focus on their work; and/or, the health related problems with respiratory illnesses keep children and teachers home from school.  Poor classroom lighting has its on own effects on children’s eyes, health, and mood.  Leaky roofs can exacerbate mold, mildew, and destroy computers, furniture, and flooring.  Even with such an incomplete list, we can exhibit and the research supports how needed maintenance affects safety, health, capital resource damage, and budgets.  Nearly all of these retrofits and renovations can save energy and thus money—money that can be used for instruction.

Part of the mission of the Education Facilities Clearinghouse is to call to the attention of educators and policy makers the magnitude of importance of  school facilities on our localities and states.  Our school buildings and grounds and their impact on all of us are multi-dimensional and more important than most people realize.

References:

Condition of America’s Public School Facilities: 2012-13.  U.S. Department of Education, NCES, Report 2014-022 (March 2014).

PK-12 Public School Facility Infrastructure Fact Sheet.  21st Century School Fund (February, 2011).

Linda Lemasters, Director, Education Facilities Clearinghouse Linda is an associate professor in the Graduate School of Education and Human Development of The George Washington University, where she teaches graduate level coursework, advises students, and directs student research.  Her areas of expertise and research include educational planning, facilities management, and women CEOs.  She actively conducts research concerning the effects of the facility on the student and teacher, publishes within her field, and has written or edited numerous books including School Maintenance & Renovation:  Administrator Policies, Practices, and Economics and book chapters including a recent chapter, Places Where Children Play, published July, 2014 in Marketing the Green School:  Form, Function, and the Future.

Printable Version of The Importance of School Facilities

National Collaborating for Environmental Health (2012).

This report provides Public Health Inspectors (PHIs) and Environmental Health Officers (EHOs) with recommendations for evaluating buildings, residences, and other built environments for mould. This information is based on Mould Assessment in Indoor Environments -- Review of Guidelines & Evidence, which includes available evidence from current research papers and mould assessment guidelines commissioned by the NCCEH.

View Recommendations

National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health (2010).

This report provides concepts on how to evaluate buildings, residences and other built environment for mould, in order to reduce the risk of exposure. The information presented in this report is based on a survey of guidelines and peer-reviewed literature; due to the lack of scientific evidence in this area, most guidelines are based on practical experience and common sense or on risk management principles. The research process and a summary of documents reviewed are presented in the appendix.

View Article

National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health (2010).

This report provides Public Health Inspectors (PHIs) and Environmental Health Officers (EHOs) with a summary of current knowledge about mould remediation. The information is based on Mould Remediation in Indoor Environments – Review of Guidelines & Evidence, a more comprehensive review of available evidence from current research papers and mould assessment guidelines commissioned by the National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health (NCCEH).

http://www.ncceh.ca/sites/default/files/Short_Report_Mould_Assessment_Oct_2010.pdf

National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health (2010).

This report provides mould remediation recommendations to Public Health Inspectors (PHIs) and Environmental Health Officers (EHOs) with the intention of making living conditions in homes better for the occupants. The mould remediation recommendations are based on available evidence from current research papers and mould assessments guidelines.

View Guidelines

Environmental Protection Agency (2008). (EPA 402-K-01-001)

Concern about indoor exposure to mold has been increasing as the public becomes aware that exposure to mold can cause a variety of health effects and symptoms, including allergic reactions. This document presents guidelines for the remediation/cleanup of mold and moisture problems in schools and commercial buildings; these guidelines include measures designed to protect the health of building occupants and remediators. It has been designed primarily for building managers, custodians, and others who are responsible for commercial building and school maintenance.

EPA_Mold Remediation in Schools and Commercial Buildings

United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air and Radiation Indoor Invironments Division (2002). (EPA 402-K-02-005)

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) developed the Indoor Air Quality Tools for Schools (IAQ TfS) Program to help schools prevent, identify, and resolve their IAQ problems. This publication describes the program and its advantages, explaining that through simple, low-cost measures, schools can: reduce IAQ-related health risks and triggers for asthma, identify sources of mold, improve comfort and performance levels, avoid costly repairs, avoid negative publicity and loss of parent and community trust, and avoid liability problems. The publication offers an overview of IAQ issues, offers examples of successful school efforts, and presents action items.

EPA_Indoor air quality tools for schools program

Minnesota Department of Health (2001).

The goal of this document is to assist the staff of Minnesota public schools in responding to problems related to indoor mold. Its focus in on practical, cost-effective methods to identify indoor mold problems and assess the causes. The main objective of any mold investigations should be to locate sites of indoor mold growth, in order to determine how to best control the underlying moisture problem and remove the contamination.

MDH_Recommended Best Practices for Mold Investigations