Skip to content

State of California, Seismic Safety Commission, 2004

The California Seismic Safety Commission has responded to inquiries from members of the Legislature, the public, and parents about the seismic safety requirements for schools in California. Concerns have been raised about the risks posed by older school buildings, the different seismic standards for public, private and charter schools, and the safety of buildings converted to school use. The public concern was increased when a pre-Field Act California public school, seismically retrofitted in 1959, was damaged in the moderate December 22, 2003 San Simeon earthquake. A common theme in these questions is that parents have a right and a desire to know if their children’s schools, whether public, private or chartered, are safe. A review of policies and standards was conducted and this report was developed to answer these questions.

View Guidebook

 

By Linda Lemasters

Protecting our nation’s children in a time of global unrest is of utmost importance to parents, educators, and the community.  The thought of the physical safety of children immediately came to my mind a few evenings ago when the news from Paris came into our living rooms.  Though schools were not involved, it reminded me that schools at all levels should be vigilant and remain ready with comprehensive emergency operations and crisis management plans.  We hope we never need to initiate such operations and plans; however, we cannot permit ourselves to become complacent.  Reviewing steps to take should a threat come to light, resolving issues of information sharing, meeting with crisis management teams, considering when to involve law enforcement, and holding a review with all responders are actions that will further emergency preparedness and assist in creating safe school climates.

First and foremost, this planning is not only for K-12, but is also paramount for pre-schools through higher education.  Although we would like to think that crises would not happen to us, none of our schools—no matter what grade level—are immune.

Second, let’s review whether or not the plans are up-to-date and current.  One of the best ways to do that is to review the guides and resources provided by the various government websites (http://www.dhs.gov/school-safety).  USDoE, FEMA, REMS, and Homeland Security are some of the excellent resources.  Another is our Education Facilities Clearinghouse (http://www.efc.gwu.edu//).  Not only does the Clearinghouse provide a library of useful resources, it can provide technical assistance by experts to your school, district, or state.

Third, administrators should make sure that the person(s) responsible for crisis management and school security has (have) all of the plans and information at the ready.  Are procedures in place?  Does everyone have the materials and resources they need?  One way to assess that is to have a tabletop exercise concerning realistic threats.  These exercises assist in clarifying roles and responsibilities, identifying needs and solutions, developing agency relationships, assessing resources and capabilities, and evaluating the workability of your plan.  Some states require tabletop exercises; however, they are worthwhile for everyone.

Reflection and debriefing of the exercise is an integral part of the tabletop.  An evaluation by each participant should be required.  After creating a comprehensive report, it is time for revisions to the emergency operations plan to address any problems that were exposed during the exercise.  FEMA offers several examples of tabletops, which may be useful (http://www.fema.gov/emergency-planning-exercises).

The fourth step is the training and re-training of all staff and employees.  This is not simply the teachers in facilities—it is all employees.  Teachers, assistants, board members, clerical, custodial, food service, transportation, IT, and any other employees need to be included.  Processes should be reviewed; any questions must be answered.

Finally, students need to be involved.  This is a sensitive issue, as we do not want to create fear in our students; rather, we need to ensure that, by including students in the planning, we will assist in allaying their fears.  When conducting this step, it is important to remember that children and students of different ages respond differently—often by actions rather than words. Careful observation is necessary.

Providing adequate explanations of safety and crisis plans; watching for and responding to signs of stress, fear, or anxiety; reminding students that trustworthy people are in charge; and, reviewing processes and procedures to use in the event of an emergency are only a few of the ways we can assist in providing a feeling of safety and security for students.  The keys to all of this are training, readiness, and predictability.  Students of all ages need to know that there is consistency in plans and the reactions of people in charge will be those that put their safety first.

Have I provided all of the information and steps you should use to review your safety and crisis management plans?  Absolutely not!  What I hope you get from this blog, however, is to keep emergency planning in the foremost thoughts of your security employees.  Only when our students of all ages feel safe will they achieve their best.

Linda Lemasters, Director, Education Facilities Clearinghouse

Linda is an associate professor in the Graduate School of Education and Human Development of the George Washington University, where she advises students, directs student research, and directs a project at Taibah University in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.  Her areas of expertise and research include educational planning, facilities management, and women CEOs.  She actively conducts research concerning the effects of the facility on the student and teacher, publishes within her field, and has written or edited numerous books including School Maintenance & Renovation:  Administrator Policies, Practices, and Economics and book chapters including a recent chapter, Places Where Children Play, published July, 2014 in Marketing the Green School:  Form, Function, and the Future.

Seltzer,  Miller, and  Seltzer, 2007

Children are especially vulnerable to environmental hazards. They eat more food, drink more liquids, and breathe more air than adults on a pound for pound basis. Children are in a critical period of development when toxic exposures can have profound negative effects, and their exploratory behavior often places them in direct contact with materials that adults would avoid.

Wildfires expose children to a number of environmental hazards, e.g., fire, smoke, psychological conditions, and the byproducts of combustion of wood, plastics, and other chemicals released from burning structures and furnishings. While wildfires are burning (acute phase), the major hazards to children are fire and smoke (described in the fact sheet “Health risks of wildfires for children – acute phase”).

View Report

Felix, You, & Canino, 2013

Disasters affect the school and community microsystems in which children and youth recover. This study explored characteristics of the school (school violence, teachers’ attitudes) and community microsystem (neighborhood climate, neighborhood monitoring, community violence) that may affect the disaster exposure and internalizing psychopathology relationship in children and youth 12–27 months after Hurricane Georges hit Puerto Rico. A representative sample (N=1,637) of caregivers and children/youth completed structured interviews in Spanish. Controlling for gender and perception of poverty, for children (age 6–10 years), hurricane exposure increased risk for internalizing psychopathology, but the school and community variables did not have an influence. For all youth (age 11–17 years), witnessing community violence and poor teacher attitudes increased the risk of psychopathology. In addition, neighborhood climate and school violence were moderators. For non-exposed youth, poor neighborhood climate and perceiving greater school violence increased the risk of internalizing psychopathology, whereas for exposed youth it did not.

View Article

Grimaz, Malison, & Torres, 2015

Ensuring the safety of people in case of natural hazards is one of the main concerns of public administrators in hazard-prone territories, particularly with reference to strategic and relevant major public buildings, such as schools. This requires the definition of a rational and effective strategy for risk reduction based on the level of risk, criticalities, countermeasures and costs. In order to evaluate these aspects, the SPRINT-Lab researchers of the University of Udine in Italy (1) developed the VISUS method (Visual Inspection for defining the Safety Upgrading Strategies). VISUS was first developed aiming to assess schools in a seismic scenario, but it has evolved into a holistic and multi-hazard approach that considers five issues: site conditions, structural performance, local structural criticalities, non-structural components and functional aspects. Each issue is analysed using a pre-codification of the expert reasoning, splitting the assessment in two main phases: the characterization and the evaluation. As a result, simple graphical indicators summarize the evaluation pointing out the main weaknesses and the needs of intervention. VISUS could be used as effective decision making tool for planning actions in risk mitigation at a regional scale following a rational approach. VISUS is adaptable to different local contexts and needs. The method provides different sub-products, such as the transfer of scientific knowledge through the capacity building of local engineers and decision makers; a mobile application for collecting related data; the production of school’s individual and collective reports; and geo-referenced national inventories of schools in mapping platforms such as OpenStreetMap or GeoNode. The method was elaborated and applied in the ASSESS project aimed at assessing more than 1000 schools in the Friuli Region (N-E of Italy) and recently it has been adopted in a prototypal project of UNESCO in 100 selected schools of three geographical departments of El Salvador (La Paz, La Libertad and San Salvador). UNESCO is planning to start new pilot projects in different countries worldwide.

View Article

 

Richard Weeks, 2010. Last Wednesday evening, the fictitious Liberty District School Board spent an hour discussing rental fees for the new Liberty Elementary School playground and athletic fields. During the televised discussion, the district’s school business official passed the superintendent a note that read, “Shouldn’t we be more concerned about the possi- bility that the pressure-treated wood on the playground is contaminated with arsenic?” The superintendent passed the note back to her with this response: “Now is not the time nor the place to discuss the possibility of leeched arsenic all over the playground. Please handle this tomorrow.”

View article

National Education Association, National Education Association. When crisis strikes, the daily lessons imparted in classrooms and on school grounds across the nation take on even more importance. In addition to academic subjects, our children learn respect and resilience and feel the daily embrace of school staff’s love and care. As educators, we are committed to keeping schools safe and supporting children and their families. That is why we developed this easy-to-use crisis guide, created by educators for educators. This publication is a shorter version of the more comprehensive online guide, which includes tools, templates and case studies.

View Report

National School Safety Center, 1998. The National School Safety Center offers the following checklist derived from tracking school-associated violent deaths in the United States from July 1992 to the present. Follow this link to the School Associated Violent Deaths Report. After studying common characteristics of youngsters who have caused such deaths, NSSC has identified the following behaviors, which could indicate a youth's potential for harming him/herself or others.

View link

National Association of Psychologists, 2006. High profile acts of violence, particularly in schools, can confuse and frighten children who may feel in danger or worry that their friends or loved-ones are at risk. They will look to adults for information and guidance on how to react. Parents and school personnel can help children feel safe by establishing a sense of normalcy and security and talking with them about their fears.

View Report